Discover Health and Wealth - Alternative Health and Wellness         

Mobile Phones Linked to Cancer


             Mobile phone: a health hazard?

             An electronics expert has claimed that some people who
             use mobile phones heavily have started to develop cancer.

             Researcher Alisdair Phillips made the claim during a
             legal hearing brought by scientist Roger Coghill, who is
             trying to force retailers to put health warnings on mobile  phones.

             Mr Phillips told the court: "I have received frequent
             reports from regular phone users telling of headaches,
             loss of concentration, skin tingling or burning and twitching.

             "The complaints can involve eye tics, short-term
             memory, buzzing in the head at night and other effects
             such as tiredness.

             "This is the first time in human existence that people
             have wandered around with radiating devices held close
             to their bodies.

             "We have got numbers of people that are now unable to
             work who have been using mobile phones up to seven or
             eight hours a day.

             "A lot of people coming to me have been heavy users.
             All have been City traders and British Telecom
             employees who are expected to use their phones every day.

             "It is too early to say, but we are starting to see
             lymphomas of the neck in heavy phone users."

             Mr Philips told the court: "If someone is completely
             healthy and has a strong immune system then
             mobile-phone use may well not give them long-term
             health problems.

             "Some people can smoke for forty or fifty years and not
             develop cancer and yet the dangers of smoking are now
             generally accepted.

             "It has been repeatedly shown that a few minutes
             exposure to cell phone type radiation can transform a
             5% active cancer into a 95% active cancer for the
             duration of the exposure and for a short time afterwards."

             Mr Phillips, a consultant advisor on electromagnetic
             fields, led a team of investigators examining possible
             health dangers in the Kuwait telephone system.

             He said: "I believe there is now adequate evidence to
             insist that all mobile phone handsets should be required
             to have a suitable warning label."

             He said the warning label would meet the requirements
             of the Consumer Protection Act.
 

             Private prosecution

            Mr Coghill, who runs an independent laboratory in
             Pontpool, Gwent, is bringing  a private prosecution against
             a telephone shop where he bought two phones.

            Mr Coghill is convinced that  mobile phones pose a major
            health hazard when used for  more than 20 minutes at a  time.

             He says the mobile phone is the biggest domestic appliance
             source of radiation ever invented.

             Mr Coghill has produced evidence that suggests that
             radiation from mobile phones can cause headaches,
             memory loss and severe damage to the immune system.

             He is on record as saying: "Anyone who uses a mobile
             phone for more than 20 minutes at a time needs their
             head examined."

             The court later heard from Dr Christopher Busby, the UK
             representative on the European Committee on Radiation  Risk.

             Dr Busby compared the energy generated in the brain
             when using a mobile phone to "a light bulb being switched on".

             He said: "I am not surprised when people say they are
             getting headaches when they use mobile phones if we
             are talking about these levels of density."

             Dr Busby was concerned that the risk of using mobile
             phones was not recognised by authorities such as the
             National Radiological Protection Board.

             Echoes of the BSE crisis

             He compared the delay in recognising the risk to the
             early days of the BSE crisis when scientists said the
             disease could not cross the species barrier.

             "There is quite a considerable time lag involved before
             these conservative bodies like the National Radiological
             Protection Board say `okay we can see there is a risk
             now'," Dr Busby told the hearing.

             "But because there is a lag between exposure to cancer
             causing agents and the manifestation of cancer this time
             lag results in the death of a lot of people."

             Barrister Hugo Charlton, who has been hired by Mr
             Coghill to fight his case, said: "Legislation says that
             goods should carry instructions or warnings.

             "But at the moment the shop is doing nothing to warn
             the public about any risks.

             "We say that a warning against excessive use would be
             reasonable in making the product safer."

             Experts from the government's National Radiological
             Protection Board are due to give evidence supporting the
             shop.

             A spokesman said: "There is no firm evidence of any
             serious health effects from using mobile phones."

             Magistrates at Abergavenny are due to spend two days
             hearing the case.


Copyright 2013